DAVAO CITY, Philippines — Journalists launched a Black Friday Protest to protect press freedom in the country.
Last Friday, January 19, 2018 journalists,bloggers and media workers mostly based in Metro Manila gathered together on Tomas Morato Quezon City to denounce the recent decision of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
The SEC revoked the corporate registration of the Rappler last January 11 for reportedly allowing a foreign company to invest in their corporation.
The decision earned the ire of the journalists, they don’t view it as a legal battle for Rappler only but a curtailment of press freedom.
The gathering was led by the National Union of Journalist of the Philippines (NUJP)
Rappler maintains the investment did not constitute equity nor give the investors veto on editorial matters, as it vowed to legally fight the decision.
The Philippine Constitution only allows 100 percent Filipino ownership when it comes to media entities.
Journalists most of them wearing black, gathered to protest the ruling as they perceived the ruling, a prelude to the dark age of the Philippine media.
The protesters carried banners saying “fight the Duterte dictatorship” and “defend press freedom”.
The Center for Media Freedom and Responsibility (CMFR) calls on every media organization regardless of its political and economic interests to explain these issues clearly and to present them in the context of business practice that has been approved by the SEC.
CMFR calls urgently on every Filipino who values free expression, to stand and unite with Rappler.
The NUJP is a joint statement said “We find it disturbing that the Philippines is now joining a trend in the region to use legal and technical bases to shut down critical media organizations or jail journalists, following the examples of Cambodia (2017), Myanmar (2014, 2017) and Thailand (2017). In most countries in the region, repressive media laws tend to control what journalists are able to report. It is regrettable that the Philippines, which has had one of the least censored press regimes in the region, is now following these countries to repress independent journalism.”
Ironically, the National Press Club of the Philippines said the legal battle of Rappler do not constitute media repression since there are many other media firms “whose operations have remained free.”
In a statement released last Tuesday, January 16, 2018, the press club agreed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which ruled that Rappler violated constitutional restrictions on foreign ownership of media companies in the Philippines.
Paul Gutierrez, the NPC President in the same statement stated “[T]he SEC finding is quite clear: that Rappler Inc., has indeed violated the law when it allowed the entry of foreign investors and also allowed, specifically, Omidyar Network Fund LLC, to have control on ‘corporate matters’ of Rappler based on its own submissions to the SEC.”
Presidential Spokesperson Harry Roque cited the Black Friday protest as a demonstration “that freedom is alive and democracy is alive in the Philippines”.
Apart from the loss of its corporate licence, Rappler’s chief executive Maria Ressa faced a second challenge after the national Bureau of Investigation summoned her to answer a cybercrime complaint.
The cybercrime charge against Rappler stemmed after a businessman accused Rappler of libel for reporting in 2012 that he lent a luxury van to then-Supreme Court chief Renato Corona who was later impeached for failing to declare his assets.
Ressa and Rappler employees vow to put up a legal fight against what they described as suppression of Press Freedom..-Editha Z. Caduaya/Newsline.ph
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.