Davao-Based employees can travel out-of-town based on the nature of work

Date:

Share post:

DAVAO CITY — The Davao City Legal Office has cleared the concerns of workers who are asked by employers to travel outside the city for work-related assignments during the General Community Quarantine (GCQ).

Legal Opinion No. 376 Series of 2020 issued on Monday, June 1, 2020, states that employers must restrict non-essential and even work-related travels for their employees.

“The instant situation is peculiar in the most employers, during this time of quarantine, are inclined to adopt the policy of restricting employees from non-essential or even work-related travels for fear of or in order to avoid the possibility of a returning employee bringing the Covid-19 disease back into the workplace and cause infection to co-workers,” the Legal Opinion states.

However, if an employment contract or the nature of work requires the employee to travel, and the work cannot be accomplished via electronic communication or other alternative work arrangements, the employee cannot refuse the employer’s travel to order as this would end up breaching his contract or committing an act of willful disobedience.

The Legal Opinion also clarifies that employees who are 60 years old or any age with co-morbidities or pre-existing illness such as hypertension, diabetes, cancer, with immunocompromised health status, or, with a high-risk pregnancy, the employee can refuse to comply to the travel order as this would be contrary to the labor guidelines on Labor Code by putting him at higher risk of the coronavirus.

The Legal Opinion also explained why employers must not force their employees to travel if, assuming, they can legally do so.

“Finally, even assuming that an employer can legally force an employee to travel for business despite the employees’ protests do to the fear of the coronavirus, the employer probably shouldn’t do it as this may create anger and resentment in the employee, and it will be bad for the employee’s morale overall,” it further states.

The City Legal office issued the Opinion after an employee asked about the validity of an order issued by the employer to travel outside the Davao City during GCQ. – from CIO/PR

RIZAL MEMORIAL COLLEGEspot_img

Related articles

NorMin Leads PH in OSAEC Convictions; CDO Steps Up Fight

CAGAYAN DE ORO CITY (July 29)  — Northern Mindanao recorded the country’s highest number of convictions in online...

Mati Airport eyed as Davao’s alternate gateway

MATI CITY (July 29)  — Mati Airport could soon serve as a second air gateway to Davao Region,...

PAL A350-1000 to debut in Davao for Kadayawan Festival 2026

DAVAO CITY (July 29) -- The country's flag carrier, Philippine Airlines (PAL), will deploy its flagship Airbus A350-1000...

Marcos vows to modernize quake-hit Davao de Oro hospital

DAVAO CITY (July 29)  — President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. has pledged to modernize the Davao de Oro Provincial...